I’ll admit that the project I assigned students for today
was a little odd. They had to execute an everyday activity in front of the
class. The activity needed to be sustained for at least one minute. On the
surface level it probably seems like an acting exercise. I did want to draw a
distinction between “presenting” the activity and “executing” it. But it still
has that quality. The assignment does indeed have a purpose. As I explained –
in order for us as a group to get to the point where we can do some interesting
thinking, talking, and work we have to get comfortable with each other. That
means sharing, creating a safe, non-judgmental environment. Beyond that my goal
is to link the execution of the actions to the development of postmodern dance,
which in turn will be linked into the notion of challenging the authority of
institutions like museums and theatres as well as the artificial divide between
life and art. The point is to get the students to think about this divide and
what happens to it in the wake of Duchamp, Cage, Cunningham, and others. Once
the sanctity of the institutions is in question the idea of a stable framing
device for artistic expression can be explored from a variety of perspectives.
I enjoyed the presentations today, although, as with the
other two projects, the tone and approach between the two classes was widely
different. The first section seemed more external whereas in the second section
many of the activities were more introspective. It will be interesting to see how
that develops over the course of the term. The point with the first round of
executions is to – well – execute the action – and watch and be watched. The
second step was to group them together and then re-watch 1/3rd of
the executions as if they were a dance piece, 1/3rd as a piece of
music and 1/3rd as a piece of theatre. This lends itself to all
kinds of discussion points – readymades, defamiliarization, happenings, postmodern
dance, theatre and post-Cagean sounds. I know that if I just asked the students
to think about everyday activities in the guise of “art” the impact is minimal.
By getting them up on their feet to execute these actions hopefully they can
begin to address the questions raised from a much more personal and engaged
perspective. I do need to give them a run down on modernist, avant-garde, and
postmodern before we are ready for that conversation. We shall see.
No comments:
Post a Comment